This (and many other) randomizers work like the beads, supporting the momentary, at least, convergence of anything brought together, the mind able to configure, to frame the momentary union with meaning (that could include reason to reject the union that could be called impossible even though it has occurred, however briefly).
Those loops of omission created by the instantaneous navigations that occur in Limited Fork Theory metaphor are forms of subtraction/extraction
yet possibility of meaning is not fully removed, even to the point where, as in Nemerov's Style, the book isn't written at all.
(Also brings to mind the essay I encountered as a grad teaching assistant: Better Writing Through Hypnosis.
To frame nothing with nothing --does a form of nothing form in your mind? No-thing --are abstract ideas in their disconnection from thing-ness, no-thing? Related to things, but not things?
Yes; means nothing; no thing is (completely) reliable?
4 comments:
Holy shit, this wins. I'm in tears
- Brent (I can't remember my password)
Dig:
The Garfield Randomizer
Also awesome, in a puzzle day sort of way.
-Matt (R)
This (and many other) randomizers work like the beads, supporting the momentary, at least, convergence of anything brought together, the mind able to configure, to frame the momentary union with meaning (that could include reason to reject the union that could be called impossible even though it has occurred, however briefly).
Those loops of omission created by the instantaneous navigations that occur in Limited Fork Theory metaphor are forms of subtraction/extraction
yet possibility of meaning is not fully removed, even to the point where, as in Nemerov's Style, the book isn't written at all.
(Also brings to mind the essay I encountered as a grad teaching assistant: Better Writing Through Hypnosis.
To frame nothing with nothing --does a form of nothing form in your mind? No-thing --are abstract ideas in their disconnection from thing-ness, no-thing? Related to things, but not things?
Yes; means nothing; no thing is (completely) reliable?
Haha, this works so well, I'm quite surprised.
Post a Comment